President Emmanuel Macron’s aides claimed the Dutch government was alone with its opposition against allowing Brussels to provide credit without political strings and to create a mechanism to share borrowing costs to rebuild economies. Elysee Palace officials claimed the Dutch position is incomprehensible and warned it could not continue with its stance. During 16 hours of talks last night and this morning, eurozone finance ministers pondered countless draft agreements over how to rebuild the EU’s single currency bloc after the global pandemic passes.
Italy bullied into surrender in secret meeting over COVID-19 crisis Matteo Salvini lashes out at Brussels and Berlin over COVID loans
Many supported the use of the €410 billion European Stability Mechanism (ESM), which is underwritten by national guarantees, to provide emergency loans with few political conditions.
Under the plan, credit lines would not include the usual inspection of government accounts or prior commitments to spending cuts or structural reforms as a price for accessing the emergency funds.
French finance minister Bruno Le Maire insisted member states need to be able to access the bloc’s bailout measures without political strings attached to deal with the impact of COVID-19.
He told reporters: “The European Stability Mechanism was created to deal with a crisis. What we are facing? A deep serious crisis.
Emmanuel Macron’s France have criticised the Dutch government after Eurozone talks fail (Image: GETTY)
France supports the concept of a joint EU debt instrument to rebuild economies after the pandemic (Image: GETTY)
“Therefore it is indispensable to be able to use this European Stability Mechanism without adding conditions that could be seen as a provocation by certain member states and aren’t necessary.”
Taking aim at his eurozone colleagues, Mr Le Maire added: “As we are counting deaths by hundreds and thousands, finance ministers are playing with words and adjectives.
“We should have a common understanding of the gravity of the crisis… We will be judged severely first by the markets, then by our population.”
But during the meeting, the Dutch continuously rejected the use of the EU’s ESM bailout fund for economic recovery without tough conditions to “take necessary measures to correct budgetary and other imbalances once the crisis is over,” according to a source.
Coronavirus POLL: Could pandemic spell the end for the EU? VOTE HERE EU split as leaders continue to take opposite approaches on COVID
French finance minister Bruno Le Maire attacked northern capitals for blocking ‘coronabonds’ (Image: GETTY)
Dutch finance minister Wopke Hoekstra insisted the Netherlands was against allowing mutualised debt from being issued without preconditions if the ESM is going to be used in the recovery process.
“I think it is reasonable and sensible that providing money goes hand in hand with reforms and agreements,” he said.
Cash-stricken Italy, with the support of Spain, France and six others, are pushing for the EU-issued bonds to share the debt burden of the post-pandemic recovery of their economies.
MUST READ: EU divided: Talks to save bloc’s economy from COVID-19 collapse
Mark Rutte’s Netherlands has been attacked continuously for rejecting unconditional EU bailouts (Image: GETTY)
They claim failure to prop up the high-debt countries risks a new eurozone sovereign debt crisis that could endanger the currency.
There is a growing panic amongst the group that Italy, Spain and France’s response to the global pandemic could see their economies sunk by the debt costs in the future.
According to an official, during the meeting, Mr Le Maire launched into a tirade against opponents of the plan saying: “Shame on you, shame on Europe. Stop this clownesque show.”
Coronavirus: The blood of survivors from Covid-19 may hold the “cure” [INSIGHT]
FTSE 100 LIVE: Tesla, Amazon, Disney, Boeing, Zoom stocks on move [FORECAST]
FTSE 100 LIVE: Global stock markets buoyed by slowdown of coronavirus [ANALYSIS]
Another Brussels source said the atmosphere between member states had become “very toxic” because of the difference in positions between richer northern member states and their poorer southern neighbours.
They added: “It’s a matter of principle and perspective, and that’s never good for compromise.”